Series: Biblical Theology
Category: Core Seminars, Bible Interpretation, Biblical Theology, Covenants
Detail:
[Questions for the class in italics throughout] Let’s start with a pop quiz. I’ll save the right answers till the end. Three questions:
Can someone tell me what all these things have in common? The Prosperity Gospel; Liberation Theology; Roman Catholicism. What do these have in common? Christian counseling or preaching that focuses entirely on your responsibility; Christian counseling or preaching which tells you it’s all your parents and society’s fault; Christian counseling or preaching which emphasizes positive thinking? And what about these? Characterizing the church’s mission as “transforming culture”; Christian pacifism; and the church/state settlement which characterized the West from Constantine to the time of the Reformation, whereby the power of state and church ruled over one “Christian Europe.”
The answer to all these three questions is, all these options are driven by bad biblical theology .
To put it positively: biblical theology (i) helps us rightly interpret the Bible, (ii) protects the church from false Christianity’s, (iii) is the engine of gospel-centered exposition, (iv) is the handmaiden of biblical counseling, (v) is the foundation for proper Christian cultural engagement.
Why should we study biblical theology? That’s why. Those five reasons.
Thank you for coming to the Biblical Theology Core Seminar.
3 weeks of intro: “What is Biblical Theology”; What are the Tools; and What Role Does It Play in the Church
Then we will apply this in two ways:
for 6 weeks we’ll take a look at 6 Storylines of the Bible
for 4 weeks we’ll look specifically about Bible Texts and unpack them using the tools of Biblical Theology
Today, let’s spend our time introducing the topic. First, let’s define biblical theology.
I. What Is Biblical Theology?
Big Idea: Biblical theology is the discipline of learning how to read the Bible as one story by one divine author that culminates in the person and work of Christ, so that every part of Scripture is understood in relation to Christ.
It’s a way to read the Bible. A hermeneutic.
Turn to Luke 24. Jesus, after rising from the dead, met two believers on the road to Emmaus, Jesus offered a crash course Biblical Theology for them. Verse 26: “26 Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” 27 And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself. ” (Lk 24:26–27)
Then look down at verse 44: “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, 46 and said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, 47 and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. ”
What book is he referring to in verse 44 that must be fulfilled? The Hebrew Bible, or what we call the Old Testament. He names the three parts as the Jews divided it: the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Writings (or the Psalms, for short).
Then what does he do in verse 45 ? He opens their minds to understand them, apparently in a way they had not before.
And with opened, enlightened minds, what could they now understand that the Old Testament actually teaches ? That the Christ should suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all nations.
What striking about the beginning of verse 46? It’s those words “Thus it is written.” This is what is written in the Old Testament: that the Christ should die and rise, and that will lead to the preaching of repentance and forgiveness. You can sum up what is written in the Old Testament with the 33 words that comprise the message following the word “written” in verse 46.
Let me use an illustration from the book Reverberation . Suppose you woke up one morning and looked at a newspaper and saw the headline, “Nationals Win World Series.” And beneath that headline was, say, a 40 paragraph story of how they did it. If I then called you in the next moment and said excitedly, “Hey, did you hear the news?” You could answer “Yes,” whether or not you had read the 40 paragraph story because you had read the four word summary “Nationals Win World Series.” The four words sum up the news or the story in those 40 paragraphs. In the same way, those 33 words in verse 46 provide us with a headline for the whole Old Testament. In fact, they provide us with a headline for the Bible, because, just as the Old Testament points forward to this even, the New Testament Epistles point back to it.
I think this illustration of story and headline helps understand the relationship between Scriptures’ use of words like “Word” and “gospel.” If I refer to “God’s Word,” what am I referring to ? Think of 1 Peter 1:23 which says, “you have been born again through the living and abiding word of God.” Does that mean Peter’s readers were born again from reading the whole Bible? All 39 books from the Old Testament and however many books of the New Testament that had been written at that point? No, the “word of God” is the word of the gospel, because the gospel summarizes the message of the whole thing. The words “The Christ should suffer and rise again for forgiveness” summarizes the Bible, like the headline “Nationals Win World Series.”
Interestingly, 1 Corinthians 15 even uses “word” and “gospel” interchangeably: “Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, 2 and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. 3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures , 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures .”
These verses provide us with Paul’s version of Luke 24.
Jesus says something very similar to the Pharisees in John 5:39 : “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me.”
Okay, a moment ago I said that biblical theology is a way of reading the Bible. It is knowing how how to read the Bible so that every part is understood in relation to Christ. It’s having our minds opened, like those two disciples on the road to Emmaus, so that we can see how it all points to Jesus.
Now, this doesn’t mean we carelessly impose Jesus on every text. It means we pay close attention to each text on its own terms, but then how every text falls into one of countless subthemes, and tracing out that subthemes like following a tributary river, until pours into a larger river, and finally into the ocean, or the story of the whole Bible.
Listen to how Don Carson defines the subject of biblical theology: “Biblical Theology…seeks to uncover and articulate the unity of all the biblical texts taken together, resorting primarily to the categories of those texts themselves” (NDBT , 100). When you first open the Bible and read through it, you encounter a multitude of categories and themes and ideas: creation, law, rebellion, rule, judgment, sacrificial lamb, atonement, a special people, and so forth. Biblical theology seeks in Carson’s words to “uncover and articulate the unity” of all these categories.
Or Michael Lawrence, in his book Biblical Theology in the Life of the Church (which you can find on our bookstall), simply says, biblical theology is the attempt to tell the whole story of the whole Bible as Christian Scripture. The key words here are “story” and “Christian.” The whole thing is telling one story, and it’s a Christian story, because it’s all about Christ.
Here’s one other analogy, one that might be helpful for any of you who grew up in the 1980s like I did. In the original Star Wars trilogy, what is the amazing piece of news that we discover right at the end of the second movie, Empire Strikes Back? We discover that Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker’s Father. Wow, that changes everything. That crucial piece of information changes how you watch the first two movies, and it changes how you anticipate the third movie, as well as the significance of everything that unfolds in the third movie.
In Scripture, the identity and the work of Christ are the crucial piece of information around which everything else revolves.
So what is biblical theology? It is the discipline of learning how to read the Bible as one story by one divine author that culminates in the person and work of Christ, so that every part of Scripture is understood in relation to Christ.
A quick example from Scripture itself. Suppose I am preaching about Samson from the book of Judges. You remember Samson. He tears apart a lion with his bare hands. He kills a thousand Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey. He’s every Sunday School boy’s favorite red-blooded biblical hero.
Will teaching about Sampson killing a thousand Philistines with a jawbone really cause people to be “born again”? I mean, didn’t Peter tells his readers that they had been “born again…through the living and abiding word of God.” Certainly Judges is a part of God’s Word. What do you think?
I think the answer to this last question is, it depends. If Samson had been preached properly , then, yes. But rightly preaching Judges takes more than extolling Samson’s virile virtues as a call to be courageous or wild at heart.
Your might talk about Samson as a type of Christ. You would say that he is a God-anointed judge, endued with remarkable power through the Holy Spirit, who his handed over to the enemies of God’s people for the purpose of rescuing God’s people (e.g. Judg. 15:14-15; 16:30).
You might ask what Samson’s story teaches us about God—his patience with his people and his determination to judge sin? What does his story teach us about our need for a savior—for one who will not disappoint us like every judge or king who has ever lived, except one?
Samson’s strength is striking. He fells a thousand Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey. But how much more striking is the picture of Christ coming on the last day, with a sword coming out of his mouth with which to strike down the nations, treading the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty (Rev. 19:15)! Only this judge is perfectly just and good.
Samson’s death is also striking. He defeats his enemies and rescues God’s people through his death. Then again, Samson’s folly and pride led to his death. Not so with Jesus, who deliberately went to his death in humility. Samson should indeed provoke our wonder, but wonder at Christ, not Samson.
In short, an expositional sermon on Judges 14 to 16 should be a gospel sermon, not a sermon that could be preached in a synagogue or a mosque. And the same is true of any sermon from the Bible. No matter where a text is located on the plot line, it should always be preached with the entire plotline in view. Again, each point of the plot gains significance only as it relates to the entire plot.
II. What Is the Bible (and what about the Bible makes biblical theology necessary)?
Now, there is a major presupposition or assumption I’m making in all of this: the way we read something is typically determined by the kind of literature it is. So if you pick up a newspaper, you read a news story in a certain way. And you read a news story differently than you read a novel, or a greeting card, or a direction manual for your latest piece of IKEA furniture. Each of these are different kinds of literature, and so there are different rules for how you go about reading them.
Biblical theology is crucial because of the kind of book the Bible is. What is the Bible—what kind of book is it—such that the discipline of biblical theology is crucial for how we go about reading it?
Of course, not everyone reads the Bible this way. Most significantly, people who don’t think the Bible is God’s inspired Word don’t read the Bible this way. An older generation of liberal scholars, for instance, might have used the phrase “biblical theology,” but they were fascinated with just the diversity of authors from a diversity of cultures and the diversity of themes of themes that run through the 66 books of Scripture. They weren’t so much interested in uncovering and articulating the unity amidst all that diversity, to use Carson’s phrase.
But we do biblical theology like this because of several things we assume about how God and how he reveals himself in Scripture (adapted from Vos, Biblical Theology, pp. 5-9)
A. God's Word Was Written by Humans
Think of 2 Peter 1: 19-21 : “you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. 21 For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” Notice that the verse refers to prophets as men who spoke, and when men speak, they use human language that both creates and reflects the culture they live in. What’s more, the authors of Scripture didn’t all speak the same language, live in the same place, under the same government. The Bible is an intensely human book, and to understand it, we have to understand the diversity of languages and cultures and contexts of the authors.
B. God’s Word Was Written by God
There’s not just diversity in Scripture, there is also unity because the Bible is a divine book. As 2 Peter 1:19-21 points out, behind the various human authors and prophets stood God. Paul says in 2 Timothy 3:16 , “all Scripture is God-breathed.” This is the doctrine of inspiration, a doctrine that doesn’t mean God blanked out the minds and personalities of the human authors and used them like a keyboard. Rather it’s the Scriptures own description of itself, as the product of the Holy Spirit working sovereignly through the human author.
The Bible is God’s self-revelation. What Scripture says God says. [Hacksaw Ridge illustration] Despite the plethora of human authors, behind the text of Scripture stands a single divine author, a single mind and will. This means that we should expect to find unity and coherence to the overarching story. The human authors may not have been able to see it at the time of their writing, but the Divine author could and did see the whole story, and wrote it so that it all fits together.
C. God’s Revealed Himself Progressively
Islam understands that the Koran was revealed to Mohammed all at once, miraculously lowered down from heaven. The sacred texts of Buddhism and Confucianism are confined to the lifetime of a single man. But God progressively revealed more and more of himself and his story over time. Scripture was written over two millennia, and its contents are not like pearls on a string, discreet and unrelated. Rather, each act of revelation followed on from what came before and prepared for what would come next.
D. God Revealed Himself in History
The crucifixion and resurrection of Christ are objective events in history that not only reveal information about God and redemption, they did something in history. Specifically, they accomplished redemption. The Bible therefore is not merely a story told by humans about God’s salvation of them, it is a drama enacted and then explained by God about God. It is “Show-and-Tell” in History. Thus in Biblical Theology we speak of redemptive history. This isn’t as opposed to real history, but rather a history that is selective and focused on the unique events that make up the narrative of God’s redemption of his people.
E. God’s Revelation Has an Organic Character
It doesn’t simply proceed like a construction site, which moves progressively from blueprint to finished building. Attach this piece to that piece. Rather it unfolds and develops from seed-form to full-grown tree. Something starts small, but then it grows, like the idea of sacrifice:
First, it’s just a burnt sacrifice whose aroma pleases the Lord with Noah.
Then it’s a substitutionary sacrifice with Abraham.
Then it’s substitutionary sacrifices that causes an angel of death to Passover with Moses.
Then it’s a substitutionary sacrifices that brings atonement in the Levitical Law.
Do you see what I mean by organic? Ideas grow like a seeds, so that their meaning expands until the originally simple truth reveals itself as complex and rich, multilayered and profoundly beautiful.
F. God Reveals Himself in Narrative
The Bible as a whole is best understood as a narrative, or single story: a story about a King, a Kingdom, and the King’s relationship with his subjects. It’s a story that encompasses us today. It doesn’t mean to merely inspire us; it encompasses us. We’re in it, so that not only do we interpret it, it interprets us, telling us who we are, and what real reality really is.
G. God Reveals Himself in News
So the Bible presents a story, yes, but that story presents us with news! It’s like the newspaper story illustration that I used above. But unlike the newspaper story of who wins the World Series, this news has dramatic implications for our lives. It’s practical. Don’t think that biblical theology is just for history and literature buffs. If it encompasses our lives, as I just said, it must have a word for how to live.
H. God Reveals Himself in Christ
There is a climax of the story of God’s redemptive acts is the person and work of Jesus. This is the point and center of gravity of the story, as we considered above.
III. How do Biblical Theology & Systematic Theology relate to one another?
Now, when I say the phrase “biblical theology,” I expect that most people don’t think of biblical theology as the discipline of reading the Bible as one story which centers on Christ. Instead, they think simply of theology that’s biblical—theology that has its source in the Bible. And this is what we typically refer to as systematic: theology that systematizes the truths of the Bible.
Just so that you have a sharper understanding of what biblical theology is, let me related it briefly to systematic theology.
What Is Systematic Theology
So what is systematic theology?
1. An Orderly and Comprehensive Summary of the Bible’s Teaching by Topic
First, it is the attempt to summarize Systematic theology isn’t concerned with the story-line, so much as it’s concerned with the bottom line . What does the Bible say about God, salvation, heaven and hell, sexuality, politics?
2. The Line Between Truth and Error, Orthodoxy and Heresy
Systematic theology seeks to formulate those summaries into precise and accurate doctrines which define Systematic theology seeks to make normative statements .
3. Scripture Applied
Finally, systematic theology not only summarizes, organizes and defines. Systematic theology also seeks to apply
How Do Biblical and Systematic Theology Relate to Each Other?
How then do systematic and biblical theology relate to each other?
Biblical theology is a mediating discipline, says Don Carson, while systematic is a culminating discipline (NDBT, p. 102-3). Biblical theology culminates, leads to, systematic theology.
Or let’s look at the chart in your handout to walk you through this:
Biblical Theology
Systematic Theology
Scripture as Authority
Scripture as Authority
Organizing principle: Historical, tracing the development of revelation
Organizing principle: Topical, logical, hierarchical
Starting point: Bible on its own terms
Starting point: contemporary questions
Provides: Storyline (news story)
Provides: Doctrine, Worldview, Application (the headline)
Connection: Bridge To ST
Connection: Summarizes and Rearticulates BT
They are both helping us understand our Bibles.
But the organizing principle of biblical theology is historical. It traces out the development of revelation. The organizing principle of systematic theology is topical, logical and hierarchical: “How do we understand the relationship between God’s three persons and one nature? What the connection between our doctrine of sin and our doctrine of salvation?”
Biblical theology seeks to describe the Bible’s teaching in its own terms. Systematic theology tries to summarize and rearticulate the Bible’s teaching in self-conscious engagement with our culture.
Biblical theology immerses us in the story-line of the Bible; Systematic Theology synthesizes the Bible’s worldview into doctrine and ethics.
One’s a bridge; the other summarizes and systemtatizes.
There is a sense in which biblical theology provides the new story—like the 40 paragraphs of our newspaper article. And systematic theology offers us the headline—like the 4 word “Nationals Win World Series.
Test Case: The Gospel
Consider how each of these disciplines help us answer the question: What’s the gospel?
Biblical Theology: Creation->Fall->Redemption->Consummation. The coming of the Kingdom of God. It’s the big overarching plan of God’s for the World.
But how is that good news to me? Do I have any reasons to believe that I need to be redeemed? That I will be redeemed?
Systematic Theology: God->Man->Christ->Response. Here’s how the grand narrative of history envelopes me and become becomes good news for me. In view of the coming of the Kingdom of God through Christ’s life, death, and resurrection (biblical theology gospel), I am either condemned or saved depending on how I respond to that good news (systematic theology gospel). For there is a message that brings me into the kingdom.
You see that both of these are related and important - to see the Big Picture of What God is Doing; but also to see the Personal Application of it for Our Lives.
Why Is Biblical Theology Important?
Last question: why is biblical theology important. We’ll think about this a lot more next week. But the short answer right now is, it helps us read the Bible rightly, so that we can engage with the world rightly. A few examples which refer back to my opening questions:
1) Suppose we turn to the Old Testament promises of a fruitful womb and fields, wealth and prosperity, for obedience to the law. Should we read those promises as applicable to us? Well, it depends on how you put the storyline together.
2) Should we treat the priest as a mediator who mediates for our sins through a re-presentation of Christ’s sacrifice in the mass? Well, it depends in part on how you put the storyline together, and whether we need another mediator.
3) Should we expect history to get progressively better, such that our works of art and architecture, justice-seeking and neighbor-loving, will actually help to usher in the eschaton, the Last Days? Well, it depends on how you put the story together.
4) Finally, how should we preach and counsel? Moralistically? Therapuetically? Triumphalistically? Or centered on the person and work of Jesus Christ? Again, it depends on how you put the story of the Bible together.
Biblical theology, in short, is critical for knowing how to read our Bibles, which, in turn, is critical for knowing what to believe and how to live.
Let’s pray.
